Menü
» Die Studie zeigt, dass sich die Deutschen nach Politikern sehnen, die alte Werte vertreten: Zuverlässigkeit und Ehrlichkeit. Die Forderung nach einem verbindlichen Ethik-Kodex, auf den sich unsere Politiker festlegen müssen, wird immer lauter. «
– Alexander Wolf
» Die Studie zeigt, dass sich die Deutschen nach Politikern sehnen, die alte Werte vertreten: Zuverlässigkeit und Ehrlichkeit. Die Forderung nach einem verbindlichen Ethik-Kodex, auf den sich unsere Politiker festlegen müssen, wird immer lauter. «
– Alexander Wolf
„The study shows that the Germans long for politicians who represent old values: reliability and honesty. The demand for a binding code of ethics, to which our politicians must commit themselves, is becoming ever louder. «
– Alexander Wolf
* Note: Maximum 5 nominations possible.
65% see trust as the most important asset in network relationships. The longing for mutual trust is directly followed by the desire for openness (51%) and honesty (49%). Also relevant are helpfulness (43%) and integrity (43%), i.e. the correspondence between presentation and action. Surprisingly unimportant (with 0% each!) is whether the counterpart shares the same cultural background, faith or political attitude. Conclusion: Germans do not necessarily want politicians whose opinion they share. They want people they can trust.
61% want a clear code of ethics for politicians However, only 19% think that our politicians should be better paid so that they no longer need favors. Surprisingly, only 36% want a stronger demarcation between private friendships and business relationships of politicians: Germans allow their representatives to have mixed network relationships, where friendships can also be transferred to business.
*Participants were asked to mark all answer options they agree with. Reading example: 40 percent of those surveyed agreed with the statement that harsher sanctions must be threatened in case of abuse of authority.
82% think that trust can only be created through reliability. Surprisingly, only 28% expect competence in order to have trust. Even empathy (only 29%) is not necessarily required for politicians to build trust with voters.
93% of the interviewees think that to have a good relationship with each other you have to share at least similar basic values. Only 7% give equal values little weight.
A relationship consists of one contact + trust, 78% find. Mutual support (61%) is also very important for a functioning relationship. However, much less important than assumed are common experiences (20%), regular contact (29%) or common interests (22%).
When is it time to get out of a network? Why do networks have such a bad image? The answers to these and more questions can be found in our first survey:
How do you ensure a balanced relationship between giving and taking? When do you have to take stock? In the third survey among networkers, the benefits of give & take are discussed.
The Dictyonomy Institute was founded by Alexander S. Wolf in 2009 to further develop sustainable networking.
The institute focuses on innovative methods to implement cross-sectoral collaboration, sustainable partnerships, team building SDG 17, community building & group connectivity.